3par 8200 patch after upgrading from build3.3.2.135 (GA) to

[pazzoide76]

HI,
I have a question about upgrading a 3par 8200.
This Friday I upgraded directly from build3.3.2.135 (GA) to 3.3.2.159-EMU1 as per hpe document 3par_storeserv_upgrade_matrix.xlsx.
I performed the following procedure:
Apply latest U kit
Upgrade SP to SP 5.1.1.0
Upgrade to 3.3.2 EMU1
Now after the update the following patches are reported to me:
Available update
3.3.2.159-P04
3.3.2.159-P08
Do these patches have to be installed even if they are related to the MU1?

Thank you

Greetings

[MammaGutt]

I have a feeling they're included. P04 and P08 should be disk firmware. EMU1 should contain P10 which is also contains disk firmware.

What does "showversion -a" give you?

[pazzoide76]

I have a feeling they're included. P04 and P08 should be disk firmware. EMU1 should contain P10 which is also contains disk firmware.

What does "showversion -a" give you?

Thanks for your answer.
This is the result of the showversion -a command:

=====================================
Release version 3.3.2 (MU1)
Patches: P10

Component Name Version
CLI Server 3.3.2 (P10)
CLI Client 3.3.2
System Manager 3.3.2 (P10)
Kernel 3.3.2 (MU1)
TPD Kernel Code 3.3.2 (P10)
CIM Server 3.3.2 (P10)
WSAPI Server 3.3.2 (P10)
Console Menu 3.3.2 (MU1)
Event Manager 3.3.2 (P10)
Internal Test Tools 3.3.2 (MU1)
LD Check Tools 3.3.2 (MU1)
Network Controller 3.3.2 (MU1)
Node Disk Scrubber 3.3.2 (MU1)
PD Scrubber 3.3.2 (MU1)
Per-Node Server 3.3.2 (P10)
Persistent Repository 3.3.2 (MU1)
Powerfail Tools 3.3.2 (MU1)
Preserved Data Tools 3.3.2 (MU1)
Process Monitor 3.3.2 (MU1)
Software Updater 3.3.2 (P10)
TOC Server 3.3.2 (P10)
VV Check Tools 3.3.2 (MU1)
Upgrade Tool 230720.U058
File Persona 1.6.101.1-20201118 (MU1)
SNMP Agent 1.14.0
SSH 7.9p1-10 (MU1)
VASA Provider 3.1.9.5 (P10)
Legacy FW Database 3.3.2.168 (P10)
Legacy Drive FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
Emulex Drive FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
Legacy HGST Drive FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
Samsung FIPS Drive FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
Samsung nonFIPS FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
Seagate FIPS Drive FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
Seagate nonFIPS FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
WDC FIPS 10K Drive FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
WDC FIPS 15K Drive FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
WDC FIPS SSD FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
WDC nonFIPS 10K FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
WDC nonFIPS 15K FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
WDC nonFIPS 7.2K FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
WDC nonFIPS SSD FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
Intel SCM FW 3.3.2.159 (MU1)
UEFI BIOS 05.05.09 (MU1)
MCU Firmware (OKI) 4.9.20 (MU1)
MCU Firmware (STM) 5.5.00 (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DC1) 4.44 (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DC2) 2.64 (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DC3) 08 (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DC4) 2.64 (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCN1) 409b (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCN2) 409b (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCS1) 409b (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCS2) 409b (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCS5) 3.07 (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCS6) 3.07 (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCS7) 409b (MU1)
Cage Firmware (DCS8) 409b (MU1)
QLogic QLA4052C HBA Firmware 03.00.01.77 (MU1)
QLogic QLE8242 CNA Firmware 04.15.27
QLogic 260x HBA FC Firmware 174.03.70
QLogic 27xx/268x HBA FC Firmware 174.03.70
QLogic 83xx HBA FCoE Firmware 08.01.05
QLogic 8300 HBA iSCSI Firmware 05.07.51
Emulex LP11002 HBA Firmware 02.82.x10
Emulex LPe12002 HBA Firmware 02.10.x08
Emulex LPe12004 HBA Firmware 02.10.x08
Emulex LPe16002 HBA Firmware 11.4.415.0
Emulex LPe16004 HBA Firmware 11.4.415.0
3PAR FC044X HBA Firmware 200A8
LSI 9201-16e HBA Firmware 20.00.13
LSI 9205-8e HBA Firmware 20.00.13
LSI 9300-8e HBA Firmware 16.00.10 (P10)

Thank you

[MammaGutt]

EMU1 contains 3P01 firmware for KPM6 drives (which was P08)
EMU1 contains 3P01 firmware for ARFX drives (which was P04)

So from the way I see it, you're good with EMU1.

[pazzoide76]

EMU1 contains 3P01 firmware for KPM6 drives (which was P08)
EMU1 contains 3P01 firmware for ARFX drives (which was P04)

So from the way I see it, you're good with EMU1.

Thanks for the support.

[T16]

Same thing happened to me, and I thought the patch had not taken.
Its reporting 3.3.2.159 (MU1)+P10 after patching with the EMU1.
Now both arrays are saying they need:-

Current version 3.3.2.159 (MU1)+P10
Critical patches P04, P08

Most confusing. Not sure what is going on.
Should I apply them, or just ignore?
Why would it miscalculate if they are required or not?