7400 4-node: zoning considerations
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:52 am
Hi 3PARUsers
I also got confirmation from HP that a 7400 4-node can only sustain a single node failure. I know this topic appeared in an earlier post and I will post the response from HP there for your perusal.
My question is, in light of this information, am I better off when creating a CPG to restrict disk selection to a controller pair and associated shelves... I have nothing setup yet, just reading and trying to put a plan in place.
The "problem" I am trying to address is how to maximize the potential of a 7400 4-node....in my virtualized environment, I have a lot of VM - hosted on blades in a C7000 chassis connecting to the SAN network via PTM - but little traffic so the number of iSCSI initiators will become a limiting factor. Only 64 are allow per port. If I create a CPG using disks on a single controller pair and connected disk cages, I could get away with connecting port 0:2:1 to switch-A and port 1:2:2 to switch-B. This would give me two paths to volumes created off that CPG and give me switch and node failure. Any thoughts.
SAN newbie and first post.
Thanks
Kieran
I also got confirmation from HP that a 7400 4-node can only sustain a single node failure. I know this topic appeared in an earlier post and I will post the response from HP there for your perusal.
My question is, in light of this information, am I better off when creating a CPG to restrict disk selection to a controller pair and associated shelves... I have nothing setup yet, just reading and trying to put a plan in place.
The "problem" I am trying to address is how to maximize the potential of a 7400 4-node....in my virtualized environment, I have a lot of VM - hosted on blades in a C7000 chassis connecting to the SAN network via PTM - but little traffic so the number of iSCSI initiators will become a limiting factor. Only 64 are allow per port. If I create a CPG using disks on a single controller pair and connected disk cages, I could get away with connecting port 0:2:1 to switch-A and port 1:2:2 to switch-B. This would give me two paths to volumes created off that CPG and give me switch and node failure. Any thoughts.
SAN newbie and first post.
Thanks
Kieran