Raid 5 3+1 vs 7+1

Post Reply
jangoormans
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:33 am

Raid 5 3+1 vs 7+1

Post by jangoormans »

We have a F400 array, which has 2 CPG of FC. One is raid 5 3 + 1, the other one is 7 + 1. in the properties of the CPG, I see availability is cage, and preferred chunklets is Fast. HP claims that the 3 + 1 should be used to create "fast" disks, with 7 + 1 being the slower tier. is this correct?
User avatar
Richard Siemers
Site Admin
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:35 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: Raid 5 3+1 vs 7+1

Post by Richard Siemers »

Preferred Chunklets "fast" refers to placement of the data toward the outer tracks of the spinning disk where data moves faster beneath the drive heads, as opposed to the slower inner inner tracks of the disk.

In addition to that, Raid 5 3+1 does perform slightly better than 7+1, but costs more raw capacity for raid overhead.

Image
Richard Siemers
The views and opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
Post Reply