Where's my disk space hiding?
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:11 pm
I'll admit I'm not overly experienced with the daily handling of 3Par arrays, not at all infact. However, I'm tasked of sizing the expansion of an existing system.
I've looked in various screens and exported several reports.
This system is an F400 3.1.1 with 96 600 GB FC drives and 16 1 TB SATA drives.
When I look at the combined "Allocated capacity" for the two CPGs using FC drives, I get a little less than 29.000 GiB.
If I report the TPVVs and sum up "RawReservedUserSpace" for the FC CPGs (and the very little RawReservedCopySpace", most copy space is on SATA drives) I get about 35.000 GiB.
Fair enough I guess, some space is used by spares and other overhead.
However, using "showspace" on the CLI, I get
Estimated RawFree (MB)
9.390.080
Do the math: 96x600 gives me 56.250 GiB Raw.
Take this minus the "Estimated RawFree" and I'm left with roughly 47.000 GiB used. I admit, doing the conversions to and from MB, GB, GiB etc makes a something lost in translation. And ok, I need some spares and stuff, but this is well over a 10 TB discrepancy?
What am I missing here? Incidently, the number for the SATA drives add up reasonably well doing the same math.
I've looked in various screens and exported several reports.
This system is an F400 3.1.1 with 96 600 GB FC drives and 16 1 TB SATA drives.
When I look at the combined "Allocated capacity" for the two CPGs using FC drives, I get a little less than 29.000 GiB.
If I report the TPVVs and sum up "RawReservedUserSpace" for the FC CPGs (and the very little RawReservedCopySpace", most copy space is on SATA drives) I get about 35.000 GiB.
Fair enough I guess, some space is used by spares and other overhead.
However, using "showspace" on the CLI, I get
Estimated RawFree (MB)
9.390.080
Do the math: 96x600 gives me 56.250 GiB Raw.
Take this minus the "Estimated RawFree" and I'm left with roughly 47.000 GiB used. I admit, doing the conversions to and from MB, GB, GiB etc makes a something lost in translation. And ok, I need some spares and stuff, but this is well over a 10 TB discrepancy?
What am I missing here? Incidently, the number for the SATA drives add up reasonably well doing the same math.