questions regarding wasted space and tunesys
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:24 am
Hi,
I'm currently working with a V800 using Thin Provisioning and Adaptive Optimization with 3 tiers (NL, FC and SSDs).
Some of our production-volumes have been operational for a while now and looking at a "showvv -s" I have noticed what I consider lots of wasted space. In the category Usr-space some volumes show a large difference between reserved and used space. While each volume uses around 3TB space the reserved space is up to 2TB larger than that. Over all volumes the difference is around 15%.
At first I hoped that over time the system would clean this up by itself but more than a week has gone by without change.
How do I get the system to free up this wasted space?
One thing I tried to resolve the above problem was to just start a tunesys (no idea whether that would have helped). But I soon found that tunesys in turn started a number of "tunetpvv snp_cpg ...".
At this point I canceled the tunesys as I was afraid that the tunetpvvs (or rather those that were still to come) would conflict with the Adaptive Optimization by moving all the volume-data back to their default CPGs.
So my second question is: Would a tunesys indeed mess up the storage tiering?
Thanks in advance
I'm currently working with a V800 using Thin Provisioning and Adaptive Optimization with 3 tiers (NL, FC and SSDs).
Some of our production-volumes have been operational for a while now and looking at a "showvv -s" I have noticed what I consider lots of wasted space. In the category Usr-space some volumes show a large difference between reserved and used space. While each volume uses around 3TB space the reserved space is up to 2TB larger than that. Over all volumes the difference is around 15%.
At first I hoped that over time the system would clean this up by itself but more than a week has gone by without change.
How do I get the system to free up this wasted space?
One thing I tried to resolve the above problem was to just start a tunesys (no idea whether that would have helped). But I soon found that tunesys in turn started a number of "tunetpvv snp_cpg ...".
At this point I canceled the tunesys as I was afraid that the tunetpvvs (or rather those that were still to come) would conflict with the Adaptive Optimization by moving all the volume-data back to their default CPGs.
So my second question is: Would a tunesys indeed mess up the storage tiering?
Thanks in advance