Re: How many nodes does 7400 can fail at same time?
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:16 am
@Cleanur, Richard:
I was not aware 2.3.1 allowed node reboots. This is an eyeopener for me. So on that one, agreed. I was not taking the older software versions into account. Apologies for that.
On the dual node failure in version 3. Just read your own explanation again, a situation where you have to thank heavens above for the fact your 3PAR didn't crash on a dual node failure is simple not an acceptable solution. In other words: The 3PAR is not build for dual node failure, so just don't let it happen, it will go wrong.
On the rebooting part. I've witnessed an occasion where a node in the other node pair was rebooted, during the outage of node in the first node pair, and the V-class 3PAR panicked. Luckily it was a POC setup so no impact, but for the technical part it does not matter.
I don't know why HP is a bit difficult about being clear this. It is not a defect, nor a shame. Other vendor solutions (EMC, etc) are neither build to survive a double component failure.
I was not aware 2.3.1 allowed node reboots. This is an eyeopener for me. So on that one, agreed. I was not taking the older software versions into account. Apologies for that.
On the dual node failure in version 3. Just read your own explanation again, a situation where you have to thank heavens above for the fact your 3PAR didn't crash on a dual node failure is simple not an acceptable solution. In other words: The 3PAR is not build for dual node failure, so just don't let it happen, it will go wrong.
On the rebooting part. I've witnessed an occasion where a node in the other node pair was rebooted, during the outage of node in the first node pair, and the V-class 3PAR panicked. Luckily it was a POC setup so no impact, but for the technical part it does not matter.
I don't know why HP is a bit difficult about being clear this. It is not a defect, nor a shame. Other vendor solutions (EMC, etc) are neither build to survive a double component failure.