apol wrote:SSMC Ports-Pane:
Made a new test this morning: no other users logged into ssmc. Login (on second try, had a typo in username…), wait 'till UI settles and historical capacity graph appears, click on "Ports", error appears, acknowledge error, logout. Collect everything from ssmcdata/data/logs that has been touched today. If you need a full "support.bat"-output please tell me! This error oocurs every single time we try to use the ports pane, it is not the occasional glitch that can happen when the network hickups. I'll mail the zip to you (2.whatever mb).
please, there was a typo in my previous post, email is ivan.iannaccone@hp.com
apol wrote:View on list of VV-Sets:
"I need to understand better they use case for wanting to load all items in one go, why are you doing that?" Well, each of our two V400s has about 490 VV-Sets, approx. 300 of them are "RCP_xxx". Even without those, SSMC would not display all VV-Sets from one of the two machines. It's not about displaying all VV-Sets from all machines at once! We could probably just use the search/filter-bar, sure, but just being able to click on the list-element you want to check/alter/whatever is a quite basic idea I think?!
it is; what is more interesting to me is how you will use the entire output, how does listing all VVset at once enable you to accomplish a task?
apol wrote:AFA / 64TB:
I read somewhere that a CPG for Dedup should not exceed 64TB, I think the reason was to minimize the chance for hash collisions. I'm not sure if that refers to "allocated size", "used-size storage-wise after dedup" or "used-size host-wise before dedup". We actually plan to put in a cpg the primaries worth approx 25TB allocated for one cluster in dc1 plus the secondaries of another, equally sized cluster in dc2. Thinking about to put some more in, we'll see about that if the first clusters are completely migrated to the AFA. Additional CPGs for next clusters, and for equally sized clusters with other hypervisor/OS. What is your take on that topic? Very interested in it, as we just startet putting hosts and data on our AFA! If our idea is wrong/not optimal, this is the moment to change direction!
yeah ping me your SN in pm.
apol wrote:Drop down lists ordering:
Sorry, but I still don't get it. In our case, it's neither alphabetically nor frequency of use-ordered… Or can we influence ordering somehow?
@all: I posted this in the forum because I think it could be interesting for others as well, but I don't want to pollute this thread - if this should go to an own thread or should be done via pm, please tell me!
It is both, if there is no logic in the usage it will revert to alphabetical.
I am fine either way! I think it's good to share this in the forum so everybody can see and not repost